Although
I spent an afternoon merrily engaged in shopping for undergarments recently I
still don’t buy these items as regularly as I feel is necessary. Years can go buy before I give the matter
more than a thought or two so such purchases are clearly not of great concern
and I can easily view them as a frivolous waste of money. Back
when I first started earning my living there was no doubt that I saw pink and
peach nylon panties and petticoats a misuse of hard earned finances – particularly
since I was likely to be the only one who saw them. It was to be some time before anyone else
was allowed to catch a glimpse of these most provocative and private garments. Quite apart from that I definitely felt the
expense involved could be more usefully diverted to Marks & Spencer’s orlon
twin sets in the same colour range that everyone could view and be impressed
by. If I cut the labels out there were even
some who might believe they were cashmere.
I was of course still a teenager and definitely a naïve one.
All
those years ago my buying was still much influenced by my mother who, along
with a great many other women of her age and ilk seemed altogether too
concerned with what people might Think should I be knocked down by a bus and
unacceptable undergarments revealed to the Hospital Emergency Department. Investing in something attractive she felt
was money well spent. Strangely my
grandmother, whose own underwear would have been decidedly basic and well worn,
seemed to share that very same anxiety.
This paired neurosis caused me to eye buses suspiciously before crossing
close to them but did not prompt any great desire for lace edged petticoats
with which to astound and electrify the medical staff at Gravesend & North
Kent Hospital in Bath Street. As my possible
injuries were treated there would be no sharp intakes of breath and admiring comments
on the delicacy of the trim. Apart from
all that it seemed a little anomalous that all the alarm was concentrated on
road traffic accidents concerning females.
Nobody was too bothered about the state of male underwear and potential
consternation caused by threadbare and inelegant y-fronts.
Nevertheless
the unease pertaining to the possible horror I might generate in the local
hospital should I have an altercation with a bus in a moment of inattention
meant I did spend a certain amount of time on Saturday afternoons browsing the
undie aisles in both M&S and BHS.
On those rare occasions when I succumbed and made a purchase after an
exacting hour considering the charms of all, I would most likely yield to the
latter retail organisation. The choice
was primarily made on a cost basis because M&S was substantially more
expensive than their local rival as we all knew. I never resorted to the Market which my
mother favoured no matter how low the cost involved and how hard she entreated
me to. The thought of the very direct
interaction with the seller, possibly male and prone to bold and brazen comments
was quite horrifying to me at the age of sixteen and was to remain so for some
time.
The
market was the destination of choice for most of our family buying and my
mother only ventured further from its charms if a solid search did not reveal
what she required. Again her choice was largely
based on cost and back in those days markets were still the cheapest option for
most local shopping. Over the
intervening years the position appears to have altered with some markets
becoming alarmingly pricey the previous batch of cheerful cheeky traders giving
way to more beautiful sales persons wearing hand-made shoes and jackets that have
an air of Bond Street about them presumably to be more in keeping with the cost
of the goods on sale.
Back in
the 1940s and 50s market underwear leaned firmly towards what were then still known
to some as vests and bloomers, the latter being high wasted and elasticated at
the knee pastel coloured in nylon for summer and flannelette for winter. My mother and aunts were united in the fact
that they found them to be more than serviceable and Aunt Mag said she was
proud to hang them on the line each Monday morning. Only Aunt Freda said she wouldn’t be seen
dead in them and like me went for a more modern design but then she was known
to be Flighty and, not surprisingly, eventually gave birth to a child out of
wedlock which everyone said would happen sooner or later considering the way
she Carried On. As a family we were
unified in the fact that we were most unlikely to go anywhere near the
underwear departments of what we saw as more exclusive stores such as Nottons
(heaven forbid) or Bonmarche and in fact these were places we rarely entered.
I
have no idea where the underclothing of my early childhood was purchased but my
most unpleasant memories of that worn next to the skin revolve around this
time. It was invariably uncomfortable
and constricting and never to be forgotten is the horror of the Liberty Bodice
which I was forced to wear until I was about ten, a strange unwieldy garment
which always seemed to have a great many small rubber buttons that were
impossible to handle - in fact I still wonder what their function was. Later on the Roll On seen essential for some
of my teenage years was somewhat similar – thick and ugly with a mind of its
own and serving only to restrict normal body movements. Back then females were strangely accepting of
the fact that it was absolutely necessary to wear what was known as a
Foundation Garment, armour-like constructions that had replaced the Stays that
my mother and aunts wore and apparently were an improvement in that there was
no need to lace them. Some time later
with a shudder of relief most females who hit their mid teens at the same time
as me firmly discarded all such monstrosities and opted for the more
aesthetically pleasing suspender belt preferably in scarlet or black. I was warned that these new-fangled belts
would do nothing to keep me warm in winter and I was certain to end up with
pneumonia but of course I was no better at listening to such advice than my
peers. Meanwhile throughout all these
adjustments in style males of a similar age and background remained happily in
their y-fronts tattered and shabby though they might be.
When
pantihose burst upon the scene in 1959 the suspender belt itself rapidly became
outmoded which caused some consternation in those who admitted to finding it
the most alluring underwear development of their lifetime. Those of us whose underwear ideology was always
going to be firmly adhered to the twentieth century were anxious to let it go
and explore more contemporary developments such as bikini style, hipsters,
thongs, boy-shorts and g-strings. I was
one of those keen to go forward to some extent whilst viewing with suspicion items
with the term Spanx in their description because of the immediate connotations
with the liberty bodice.
Sadly my overall progress was destined always
to be much the same as it was during the great leap forward of the 1960s when
we were all advised to burn our bras which was all very well if you did not
need a bra in the first place. This of course might be the real reason for an
enduring lack of will to spend money on anything that has a hint of
Undergarment about it.