I wonder what it was that
made our mothers, as one, insist that money spent on Decent underclothes was
money well spent because of being unexpectedly run over by a bus. Was it that more women were mown down
without warning back in the days of their own youth? And were buses actually to blame? And more to the point did hospital staff
really and truly gasp with horror when a bus injured patient’s undergarments
were revealed and shown to be somewhat past their use by date? Were they actually heartless enough to point
it out to each other whilst drinking tea later in the canteen? Did you notice the state of her Stays? I rather doubt this scenario but according to
my mother, and maybe yours, this was what I could expect if I ended up in the
Accident & Emergency Department wearing anything but a dazzlingly enviable
matching set of undies of pastel shade preferably recently purchased from Marks
& Spencer’s.
Although she did specifically nominate M&S
when speaking to me, secretly British
Home Stores would have done equally well and this wasn’t entirely because they
were a bit cheaper. It also had to do
with the fact that they had at some stage in Gravesend’s commercial past taken
over the site previously occupied by Missings.
That particular stalwart of the Edwardian undergarment business in Gravesend
was said to have provided everything the Modern Woman could possibly need in
the way of Corsetry, with the most up-to-date models to choose from at
exceptionally keen prices! To some
extent this must have been true because my Grandmother and various Aunts
routinely took the 480 from outside The Jolly Farmers in Crayford to inspect
their wares. These journeys did not
simply have undergarments in mind because Missings also ran an enviable line in
Drapery and at one time Millinery as well.
My Grandmother was known to say that their window display was a Sight
for Sore Eyes.
Missings was long gone by
the time I was old enough to buy my own clothing and already realise that I was
destined never to have an entirely happy relationship with undergarments. As a small child this was largely because
during winter months I seemed to have to wear far too much of it - apart from
an unbearably itchy vest and rather unnecessary petticoat the hideous Liberty Bodice
loomed large to torture me for many years.
I’ve commented on this garment previously I know but anyone who has ever
worn one will understand perfectly why it needs a revisit!
Gentle Google research has
revealed an astonishing I Love My Liberty Bodice exhibition that in early 2020 could
be visited at Harborough Museum and tells the fascinating story of
Leicestershire corsetry manufacturer Symington & Co who developed the new and
much reviled garment for the next three generations from the beginning of the
20th century. Production only
ceased in the mid nineteen sixties!
Apparently a particularly inventive and determined marketing campaign
secured its position in the lives of British children although it seems that
the idea for the garment originated in America.
Who were the museum-goers
flocking to this event I ask myself and I even wonder if it was postponed or
possibly even cancelled on account of Covid.
As time passes it becomes
more and more pertinent to critically examine why some garments were ever
thought rational and the Liberty Bodice has to be one of them particularly as
some clothing historians seem to see it as a precursor and training for the
equally dreaded Corset. I’ve never
really understood the difference between Corsets and Stays and my mother,
together with her sisters referred to the tightly laced pale pink piece of
underclothing as either. Versions of
them seem to have been worn from at least the eighteenth century when visitors
to England consistently commented on how even the peasants wore stays. I wonder how they knew? In
France it appears that in general the lower classes seem to have gone without
and even the middle classes might go stay-less for medical reasons. However, in England they were a literal
symbol of a woman’s uprightness and virtue whatever her background. So tightly were women laced into them that
it does seem to have contributed to the irritating habit of the Victorian woman
to faint at the drop of a hat.
My grandmother clearly
thought that a loose corset was the sign of a loose woman and always commented
in a derogatory manner as to the decency and degree of her acquaintances and
neighbours stay-lacing. That Dolly
Flanagan is a trollop if ever I seed one, up at the Co-op and in the queue if
you don’t mind bold as brass without her stays laced proper! Even
as she spoke I was on the side of Dolly, having witnessed my own mother’s agony
with the tightness of her stays. Though she would have never been likely to
venture from the house without them laced in the proper manner.
Old Nan could be quite
didactic at times, surprising us with high minded ideas that did not sit easily
alongside what we knew of her. My
mother called her Strait-Laced, but never directly to her face of course. Aunt Maud said she well remembered the time
years ago when Old Nan had taken four or five of her girls into Gravesend to
Missings to buy a new hat for herself and for each of them a pair of the very
latest in Stays though by then they were being described as Corsets. It had been after a win at the races and she
was feeling very flush. They could
choose between pink, peach or even white and afterwards they went for a fish
tea in the High Street and had a walk along the prom. I wondered why the Stays were referred to as
a Pair like shoes and nearly asked but they’d started talking about those men
who regularly stood outside inspecting the window display as if they were about
to buy a piece of intimate apparel for their wives yet never did. And no
matter how many euphemisms they used my cousin Pat and I exchanged glances and
rolled our eyes at each other to indicate how very mature and knowing we were.
I don’t recall when my
mother gave up her Stays/Corsets and there was certainly no pressure on me to
launch into the experience but she did suggest once I started work that I
should buy a Proper Girdle as I had put on a few pounds. Back in the 1950s unless you were being
Professionally Fitted for such garments you really had to hazard a guess as to
your size and invariably the size finally purchased became something of an
issue and never fitted properly. I
didn’t know about Professional Fitting at the time and even if I had been fully
informed I cannot imagine I would have engaged in it as I was far too
embarrassed about my shape being less than perfect. Consequently for several decades I was
destined to never own comfortable underclothing and quite the worst offenders
were Bras.
My first bra had
originally been owned by my mother before her marriage. I’m unsure if she ever felt at ease in it herself
but by the time I inherited it at the age of fourteen it proved itself to be
anything but comfortable and it was clear my needs were greater than a size
32A. Nevertheless I was not to own the
much coveted 36C for a year and a half which is a long time to cope with the discomfort. I would have been dissatisfied before too
long in any case because the latest In Thing at school were bras like those
worn by such icons as Lana Turner and Jayne Mansfield, underwired and conical
and variously known as the Bullet Bra.
It had to be worn under a tight sweater and then you could call yourself a
Sweater Girl.
It wasn’t long before
something called The Wonderbra began to grow to more than the germ of an idea
in the mind of its creator. A whole
host of us flocked towards it, discarding those other old-fashioned items – stockings
and suspender belts, as we did so.
Pantihose had arrived with a vengeance and although the men in our lives
maintained a growing chorus with regard to what they saw as ideal female
underclothing, we were in no way eager to pay much attention, especially if we
had already burned our bras. Following
in the footsteps of Germaine Greer we had a hankering to become feminists
especially once we realised that there was no actual need to be Australian to
do so. You could say that after years of
upper body restriction a kind of hysteria was taking over.
I did not actually go to
the extent of bra-burning, preferring simply to hide the most offensive garments in the very back of the
underwear drawer, and my best friend and then flatmate Stella did
likewise. We agreed that had we had the
minimalistic bosom area we both admired we may well have made a different
choice. Instead we invested in the very
latest Wonderbras because they had a delightful push-up effect exposing the
body to its best advantage or so we thought.
We did throw away our Playform Girdles though and frequently advised
each other how sensible we were to totally ignore the sexist appeals voiced by
toxic males regarding suspender belts. However,
despite our best intentions and although it had little to do with the progress in
underwear design, in the final analysis we did not make ideal feminists.